Nova Southeastern University's Office of Sponsored Programs, a unit within the Division of Research and Economic Development, provides technical administrative support in each phase of obtaining and managing awards from proposal development/submission (pre-award) through the project's implementation and close-out (post-award).
Pre-award services include identification and dissemination of funding opportunities; serving as liaison to funding sources; review/interpretation of grant application guidelines; assistance with proposal preparation (forms completion, budget preparation, proposal review prior to submission); submission of proposals; and completion of assurances/certifications.
Your assigned OSP Grant Officer will help you in all aspects of grant preparation and submission, including budget preparation. Each OSP Grant Officer is assigned to specific colleges and centers. To find out your assigned OSP Grant Officer please visit the Staff page on our web site.
The time necessary for pre-submission review of an application varies with its size, complexity, completeness, and accuracy, care taken in its preparation and prior review, and availability of OSP staff. To allow for necessary corrections and revisions and for greater assurance that sponsor deadlines will be met, allow at least five full working days for OSP to review the proposal.
Proposals which contain exceptional or unique features including cost sharing commitments, conditions that necessitate legal review, etc., may require additional lead time.
The Office of Sponsored Programs should be contacted as soon as possible in the process to learn if any other university units intend to submit a proposal to the same competition. The OSP will contact all parties to determine if there are opportunities for collaboration and attempt to have parties reach consensus on which unit should take the lead and/or submit the proposal. If no decisions can be reached, the issue will be brought to the attention of the respective deans for resolution.
The method of submission is governed by (1) the sponsor's guidelines and (2) timing. Proposals may be submitted electronically through Grants.gov or another web-based system, mailed through the US Postal Service, sent by Federal Express, hand-delivered, faxed, or emailed, depending on sponsor requirements. All submissions through Grants.gov must be submitted by the Office of Sponsored Programs. For hard copy submissions, when the OSP has received the proposal well in advance of the deadline, the investigator may request that it be transmitted by the OSP. Submission arrangements should be discussed and decided during the initial stage of working with OSP.
Proposal development often necessitates providing institutional statistics (i.e., enrollment levels, graduation rates, faculty info, employee and student demographics, etc.) to demonstrate eligibility requirements, introduce reviewers to the institution, demonstrate needs, or for other reasons. Please note that Principal Investigators/Project Directors must use official institutional data in proposals/applications, and such data should be obtained through the Office of Institutional Effectiveness. Many of the most common institutional statistics can be found in the NSU Fact Book. Staff members in the Office of Institutional Effectiveness can provide information, consultation and guidance regarding specific institutional data requests needed for inclusion in proposal applications. If assistance is needed in transforming institutional data into grant appropriate language, please contact the Grant Writing Laboratory.
The Grant Writing Laboratory maintains boilerplate language and information regarding university facilities, equipment and resources, and can assist Principal Investigators/Project Directors with customizing this information based on the specifics of their proposals.
Direct costs are those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity, or that can be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. Costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct or F&A costs. Where an institution treats a particular type of cost as a direct cost of sponsored agreements, all costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances shall be treated as direct costs of all activities of the institution.
Indirect cost rates, also known as Facilities and Administration (F&A), cost rates, are Federally negotiated rates that allow a grantee institution to recover certain costs incurred for joint or common objectives and therefore cannot be specifically identified with a particular sponsored project. These costs include general administration, building operation and maintenance, depreciation, and similar costs.
NSU’s Facilities and Administrative cost rates are applied to the modified total direct cost base, which consists of all direct costs excluding capital equipment and other capital expenditures, charges for patient care, rental costs, tuition remission, scholarships and fellowships, participant support costs, and the portion of each subaward in excess of $25,000 (regardless of the period of performance of the subaward(s)). For current cost rates, please visit our NSU Fact Sheet.
You will need to fill out a form Waiver of Facilities and Administrative Costs which should be signed by the appropriate individuals granting approval to waive NSU's negotiated F&A rates.
Current fringe benefit rates may be found on the OSP Web under NSU Fact Sheet.
College and non-sponsor resources provided in support of sponsored programs; includes contributed effort and matching funds. Generally, voluntary cost sharing is not permitted under university policy. Contact your OSP Grant Officer for additional information.
OSP policy #36 provides information related to conditions when cost-sharing is permissible. If you have additional questions please contact your OSP Grant Officer.
A salary cap is defined as a maximum annual rate of salary for
Since 1990 Congress has been legislatively mandating a limitation periodically on direct salary (excluding any fringe benefits and F&A costs) for recipients of NIH (and other selective agencies) grants. Salary limits on grants, cooperative agreements
In addition to the NIH, the agencies that enforce salary cap are HRSA, SAMHSA, CDC, and AHRQ. At NSU, salary cap limitation applies to all awards that NSU receives from NIH, HRSA, SAMHSA, CDC, and AHRQ.
If a faculty member on a sponsored project has a salary that exceeds the cap, the department will have to cover the difference proportionate to the percent effort on the project.
For example, a PI’s current institutional base salary is $210,000. They are requesting 10% effort on an NIH grant. The salary cap is $203,700.
In this case, salary requested in the grant budget capped at 10% of $203,700 ($20,370) instead of 10% of $210,000 ($21,000). The difference ($630) is the amount that will need to be covered by the department. OSP Grant Officers will assist
The OSP Grant Officer assigned to your college/center can assist you in the preparation of the proposal budget. Please allow reasonable lead time.
To get commonly requested institutional information, such as F&A rates, Fringe Benefit rates, DUNS number, etc., please visit the Resources link (Pre-Award Tab) and click on “NSU Fact Sheet”.
Yes. The Principal Investigator/Project Director can use the budget template (an Excel document), with OSP assistance as needed, to develop and finalize a budget for the proposal to be submitted. The final budget will often need to be transferred to sponsor-specific forms, as applicable. Contact your OSP Grant Officer for assistance.
The Federal Office of Management & Budget’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards defines organized research as all research and development activities of an institution that are separately budgeted and accounted for. It includes:
"Other sponsored activities" means programs and projects financed by Federal and non-Federal agencies and organizations which involve the performance of work other than instruction and organized research. Examples of such programs and projects are health service projects, and community service programs. However, when any of these activities are undertaken by the institution without outside support, they may be classified as other institutional activities.
Research and scholarly activities conducted at NSU incur two types of costs. For every grant dollar the University spends on the direct costs of conducting research or other projects, the University incurs additional costs to maintain the facilities used for the projects and to support the administration of those projects i.e. Facilities and Administrative Costs (F&A).
Direct costs pay for the resources that a single research project uses. They are those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity, or that can be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. These costs may include salary for a research assistant, a chemical for a specific experiment, or the travel costs associated with the implementation of a specific project. They are the costs that researchers readily identify as the cost items in their contract or grant budgets.
Recovered F&A Costs pay for the costs of research that cannot be easily identified with or billed to one project. The federal Office of Management and Budget has studied this for many years and in the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, F&A are defined as costs that are incurred for common or joint objectives and, therefore, cannot be identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity. F&A costs are synonymous with "indirect" or “overhead” costs. These are real costs that may include the costs of electricity to run the building in which a sponsored project is conducted, equipment shared among researchers, salaries to pay for department staff assistants, or library subscriptions to academic journals. It is very tempting not to think of these services as part of the real costs associated with a project, but they constitute a significant portion of the total resources consumed by any sponsored project.
In order to recoup some of these expenses, F&A costs are included as a specific line item in sponsored project budgets. NSU recovers these costs through the application of F&A rates to all grant budgets.
At NSU direct costs and Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs are extracted from the University’s independently audited financial statements and categorized into direct and indirect cost pools representing basic University functions. This process is governed by federal regulations.
NSU’s rates are negotiated with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the agency responsible for approving the University’s F&A rates on behalf of all federal agencies. Predetermined rates are negotiated to simplify the administration of cost type research and development contracts and grants, to facilitate preparation of budgets, and to permit more expeditious closeout of awards when the work is completed. NSU’s rates are generally negotiated for a three-year period, although regulations permit a two- to four-year period when experience indicates F&A rates would be essentially stable during the ensuing periods.
NSU negotiates separate on-campus and off-campus rates for HPD, Oceanography, and the main campus to account for the varied aspects of their programs, operations, and research facilities. When projects are completed off-campus, negotiated F&A rates are lower, since they exclude office space, equipment, and maintenance. Both on-campus and off-campus F&A rates are applied to direct costs excluding capital equipment and other capital expenditures, charges for patient care, rental costs, tuition remission, scholarships and fellowships, participant support costs, and the portion of each subaward in excess of $25,000 (regardless of the period of performance of the subaward(s)) to determine the amount allocable to each individual agreement. NSU’s rates can be found in the NSU Fact Sheet available at http://www.nova.edu/osp/resources/pre-award.html.
These rates are derived from our audited financial statements and represent the costs of doing business here at NSU. With the exception of Oceanography, our rates are commensurate with other institutions, as the average for all universities in the country is about 50%.
Most agencies that fund sponsored programs have F&A costs associated with their own operations and therefore would anticipate F&A costs when they make awards for a research grant. Although it may not be very obvious, Principal Investigators who obtain very small grants or use very little space and equipment still incur indirect costs, which are often a greater percentage of their awards than larger grants. While it is true that the actual F&A incurred varies from project to project, the cost of calculating these actual costs in detail would far exceed the savings that could be generated for any given project. It is therefore a cost saving measure to charge each project an average represented in the approved rate.
As part of our negotiations with DHHS, NSU gave the Federal Government the assurance that awards issued by the Federal Government will not be "used to subsidize the F&A costs allocable to non-Federal awards." Each time we waive indirect costs on a non-federal project, we inadvertently subsidize the F&A costs allocable to that project with F&A costs recovered from federal grants and contracts awarded at the negotiated rate.
Arbitrary waiving of F&A costs also leads to inconsistency in the treatment of sponsored projects and principal investigators. This type of inconsistency can generate a disincentive to participation in sponsored project activities and may become counterproductive to the development of sponsored research.
Principal Investigators who ask for waivers of F&A costs frequently do so in an attempt "to reserve enough funds for the execution of the project," instead of funding the "administration" of the project. While this point has its own merits from the perspective of the Principal Investigator, it amounts to a false economy, in that it invariably leads to the undocumented supplementation of the costs of a project from other sources of revenue. It amounts to inadvertent cost sharing on the part of the University. Since the University provides cost sharing, when appropriate, for a number of projects that are carried out by our Principal Investigators, we need to treat all cost sharing, including the "waiving of F&A costs," in a similar fashion.
While it is the university’s policy that F&A costs are not to be waived on sponsored projects to support research, teaching, and service, it is recognized that some federal, state, and local government funding programs, as well as some private foundations, professional associations and corporations have an established policy that restricts the rate of F&A cost payment. There may be instances in which it would be beneficial for the University to accept a limitation on reimbursement of the F&A cost rate rather than its federally negotiated rates, or to waive F&A cost recovery. In these instances, a proposed project/program may be beneficial to the University, for a number of reasons, and therefore, such benefits may outweigh the recovery of full F&A costs.
In instances where a sponsor will not reimburse the university at the negotiated F&A cost rate, the Principal Investigator/Dean of the school to which the project has been offered may request a waiver of F&A costs. The waiver is normally reviewed and approved, subject to sponsors restrictions and policies directly by the Dean of the school; final authority rests with the Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer or the Executive Vice President and COO or his/her designee, and for Health Professions Division (HPD), the Chancellor. In the event the Dean of the school refuses a waiver request, the Principal Investigator of the proposed project may appeal directly to the Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer. Once a waiver has been approved, it is retained in the proposal/project file maintained in the Office of Sponsored Programs.
Principal Investigators should discuss the budget needs of their proposed project with their respective Dean/Department Head and the Office of Sponsored Programs staff before submitting a final budget or before informally discussing project costs with a potential sponsor. All proposals requiring F&A cost rates that differ from NSU’s negotiated rates must be consistent with the provisions of the University's Policy on Application of Facilities and Administrative Costs Rates to Proposal Budget & Facilities and Administrative Cost Waiver, which may be found at https://www.nova.edu/portal/osp/policies.index.html. The Waiver of Facilities & Administrative Cost form is available at http://www.nova.edu/osp/resources/pre-award.html.
All the preceding questions and answers are aimed at clarifying the need for including F&A costs as a legitimate line item in the budget of every sponsored project.
It is the policy of NSU to use recovered F&A costs to cover the costs of its research-related infrastructure. It is also the policy of the University to use available funds from recovered F&A costs to support and catalyze additional basic applied, and clinical research, training and community service. F&A costs recovered from all externally funded grants, contracts and other agreements are allocated as follows:
The Facilities and Administrative Cost Recovery Policy may be found at https://www.nova.edu/portal/osp/policies/index.html.
The interval of time, usually 12 months, into which the project period is divided for budgetary and funding purposes.
The total time for which support of a project has been programmatically approved. A project period may consist of one or more budget periods.
Effort expended on a sponsored project the sponsor does not compensate for; a form of cost-sharing.
The one individual designated by the applicant organization to direct the project or program to be supported by the grant. The principal investigator also referred as Project Director is responsible and accountable to applicant organization officials for the proper conduct of the project or program. Typically, this is a faculty member or administrator, who submitted a proposal that was accepted and funded by an external sponsor.
In addition to the principal investigator, Key Personnel are defined as individuals who contribute to the scientific development or execution of the project in a substantive, measurable way, whether or not salaries are requested. Generally, key personnel are identified in the proposal and a biosketch is provided.
Any organization legally distinct from the university (whether affiliated or not with the university) or any individual not employed by the university other than a consultant or volunteer acting directly under the university’s direction and control.
For the purposes of this policy, a vendor is an entity that provides goods or services to the university or subrecipient under a prime award that are needed to carry out a sponsored project or program. For the purposes of this policy, “vendor” is synonymous with “contractor”. Characteristics of a vendor:
Consultants are, generally, a type of vendor; consultant payments on sponsored projects must represent compensation to individuals who are NOT NSU employees and who render independent services that are needed for the performance of a particular project. Normally, consulting needs can be met from resources within the University community. However, if the expertise needed for the project is not available within NSU, then an outside consultant may be charged if all of the following criteria are met:
Principal Investigators are advised to explain in the proposal narrative or budget justification that the specific skills or expertise of the consultant either do not exist within the university or are not readily available. Principal Investigators must review and follow Office of Procurement Management policies and procedures related to requesting services and to single/sole source requests (www.nova.edu/procurement/policies.html), for additional information, contact the Office of Procurement Management.
A subaward agreement is a third party agreement made under a prime award by the original prime award recipient to another eligible recipient, or by a subrecipient to a lower tier subrecipient. If the university issues an agreement to another entity (subrecipient) to carry out some of the activities within the scope of work, this is considered a subgrant, subaward, or subcontract as opposed to a vendor agreement. If the university awards a subaward, the subrecipient must agree to the applicable terms and conditions of the prime award. The federal government requires prime recipients to flow down the terms and conditions to lower tier recipients. Subrecipients are subject to audit under the OMB Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
Obtain a Statement of Intent from each sub recipient's authorized official that includes an itemized budget, with justification, a statement of work to be performed, and description of the sub recipient's qualifications to do that work. Many federal agencies require a completed cover sheet, certain certifications signed by the subrecipient's authorized official, and a completed budget form for the subaward budget. The total cost of the subaward (direct and indirect costs) is rolled up into your budget in the Contractual or Other Direct Costs category. Your OSP Grant Officer can assist you with this process.
A Subaward is a formal agreement with an organization (not an individual) to perform specific tasks in support of the proposed project independent of the PI.
A Consultant Agreement is used when an outside expert (i.e., non-NSU employee) will be a consultant to provide services in some aspect of the scope of work of the proposed project. The individual serves on the project for a limited amount of time as an individual under the supervision/coordination of the PI. NSU personnel normally cannot serve as consultants on an award made to the University (consult with your OSP Grant Officer for additional information). Principal Investigators must review and follow Office of Procurement Management policies and procedures related to requesting services and to single/sole source requests (for more information, visit www.nova.edu/procurement/policies.html or contact the Office of Procurement Management).
A Vendor Agreement is a contract for goods or services under a prime award which does not involve substantive programmatic activities described in the prime recipient’s proposal or scope of work. If the university is acquiring supplies or equipment needed to perform the sponsored project, the entity providing the goods or services is not carrying out substantive programmatic activities under the prime award and is classified as a vendor. Therefore the terms and conditions of the prime award do not flow down. Principal Investigators must review and follow Office of Procurement Management policies and procedures related to requesting services and single/sole source requests (for more information, visit www.nova.edu/procurement/policies.html),The PI must ensure that vendors perform services in accordance with terms of their vendor agreements or purchase orders. Questions should be directed to the Office of Procurement Management.
From subrecipient organizations, you will need a Statement of Intent that includes a proposal (including statement of work), signed by person authorized by organization to make the commitment; detailed budget, including subcontractor's fee (if allowable) and indirect costs. Such documentation generally must accompany NSU’s proposal to the sponsor. The OSP Grant Officer will assist you in obtaining this information. The proposal may also require a letter of collaboration from the Subrecipient’s Principal Investigator confirming their commitment to the project.
For Consultants, a letter of collaboration (expertise to be provided, consultant rates) and C.V. are needed for documentation, and may need to be included in the proposal.
Yes. Training is available from the Grant Writing Laboratory and the Office of Sponsored Programs. For information about available training, please click on Training on our website.
If your project involves research with human subjects, please visit the Institutional Review Board (IRB) website or contact your IRB Center Representative further assistance.