1B. "PROTOZOA": CLASSIFICATION

Classification schemes have been as diverse as the organisms they try to classify. Even older schemes, based entirely on light microscopy, recognized some groups as practical rather than natural. Newer schemes add structures visible via electron microscopy plus a better understanding of physiology, genetics, biochemistry and molecular biology.

Kozloff uses the traditional classification put together by a committee of protozoologists:

The following classification scheme discusses only those important groups included among the traditional "Protozoa", with a few exceptions. Most groups traditionally studied chiefly by botanists (e.g., red algae, diatoms) or mycologists (fungus-like groups and slime molds) are omitted.
 
I. AMITOCHONDRIATE EUKARYOTES

Considered among the most primitive eukaryotes, or at least those that diverged earliest among the Eucarya. As a result, they have sometimes been placed together in a single group called the Archezoa. However, no features link these groups beyond their common, apparently plesiomorphic lack of mitochondria, and recent research suggests that the mitochondria have been secondary lost. Several other groups not discussed here (e.g., retortamonads, oxymonads) were formerly grouped together with the parabasalids and diplomonads among the zoomastigophorans, the "animal flagellates".

1. PARABASALIA

1a. Trichomonads 1b. Hypermastigotes (e.g., Trichonympha) 2. DIPLOMONADS 3. PELOBIONTA (KARYOBLASTEA) (e.g., Pelomyxa palustris) 4. MICROSPORA (e.g., Nosema) II. MITOCHONDRIATE EUKARYOTES

Mereschkowsky first suggested in 1905 that mitochondria derived from bacteria, and Margulis revived the hypothesis in 1970. Comparisons of ribosomal RNA and other molecules have since confirmed the idea. The current hypothesis holds that mitochondria originated as endosymbionts, most likely one group of "purple bacteria", and that the relationship arose once, making possession of mitochondria a synapomorphy identifying a  mitochondriate eukaryote clade. Precise phylogenetic relationships among many of the groups are still unclear. However, most traditional groups such as the phytomastigophorans (plantlike flagellates), sarcodines, actinopods and radiolarians have been broken up and are no longer recognized as coherent, monophyletic groups.

5. EUGLENOZOA

5a. Euglenids (e.g., Euglena, Peranema)  5b. Kinetoplastids 6. "AMOEBAS"

A variety of free-living and parasitic amoebas, together with some slime molds and the amitochondriate Pelomyxa were formerly classified together as the Rhizopoda. Unpublished RNA data scatters them polyphyletically across the Protoctista.

6a. Free-living lobose amoebas 6b. Free-living filose, testate amoebas 6c. Entamoebids 7. ACTINOPODA 7a. Polycystinea 7b. Phaeodaria 7c. Acantharea 7d. Actinophryids (Actinophrys, Actinosphaerium) 8. GRANULORETICULOSA 8a. Foraminiferida 9. XENOPHYOPHOREA 10. PRYMNESIOPHYTA (or HAPTOPHYTA) 11. CHLOROBIONTA Recent ultrastructural and molecular studies (small subunit rDNA) recognize two monophyletic lineages: one containing most groups of green algae, and the other containing the charophyte green algae and plants. Only the microscopic, permanently flagellated species of green algae are traditionally considered among the "Protozoa."

11a. Volvocida (Volvocales)

12. ALVEOLATA

Includes three major "protozoan" groups that, traditionally, were never considered closely related: the dinoflagellates, ciliates and apicomplexan sporozoans. The following features that they have in common had to await electron microscopy and molecular biology before they could be discovered:

12a. DINOFLAGELLATES (whirling whip-bearers) 12b. CILIOPHORA (Ciliates) Major subdivisions of ciliates (superclasses and classes) are based chiefly on details of infraciliature structure and will not be discussed here. However, distinctive, important subgroups are outlined below:   12b1. Karyorelictids (e.g., Tracheloraphis) 12b2. Heterotrichs (e.g., Stentor, Spirostomum) 12b3. Oligotrichs (e.g., Tintinnopsis, Halteria) 12b4. Hypotrichs (e.g., Euplotes) 12b5. Haptorids (e.g., Didinium) 12b6. Trichostomatids (e.g., Balantidium, Entodinium) 12b7. Suctorians (e.g., Acineta) 12b8. Peniculids (e.g., Paramecium, Tetrahymena) 12b.9. Peritrichs (e.g., Vorticella, Zoothamnium, Carchesium)  12c. APICOMPLEXA 12c1. Gregarinea (Gregarina, Monocystis) 12c2. Haematozoea 12c3. Coccidea 13. STRAMENOPILES
A highly diverse collection of protoctists grouped on the basis of molecular and ultrastructural studies. Members include groups formerly considered as algae (e.g., diatoms, brown algae), fungi (oomycetes: water molds) and flagellates. Only those traditionally considered among the "Protozoa" are included here. 13a. Dictyochales (silicoflagellates) 13b. Opalines 13c. Labyrinthulans (Labyrinthula, Thraustochytrium)  14. CHOANOFLAGELLATA (Codosiga, Salpingoeca)  
REFERENCES

Barnes, R.S.K. 1984. A Synoptic Classification of Living Organisms. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. 273 pp.

Corliss, J. O. 1984. The Protista Kingdom and its 45 Phyla. Biosystems 17:87-126.

Hausmann, K. & Hulsmann, N. 1996. Protozoology (2nd ed.). Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart. 338 p.

Margulis, L. & Schwartz, K.V. 1988. Five Kingdoms. (2nd ed.) Freeman, NY. 376 pp.

Zettler, L. A., Sogin, M.L. and Caron, D. A. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships between the Acantharea and the
Polycystinea: A molecular perspective on Haeckel's Radiolaria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94:11411-11416.
 
 


<====
Back to my home page