Esophoric patients having a high AC/A ratio will have more eso at near than at distance. For these esophores, their problems are usually worse at near. Fortunately, added lenses are especially effective in changing vergence because of the high AC/A ratio.
Immediately after assessing the refractive error and how corrective lenses facilitate sensory and motor fusion, consideration should be given to prescribing added plus power for an esophoria at near.
The high AC/A ratio dictates prompt attention to the benefits of added lenses --- which is different for patients with low or normal AC/A ratios. As pointed out earlier, the calculated AC/A ratio gives a good indication of the actual vergence change that will take place.
Prisms are considered next, especially for any vertical deviation indicated on the associated phoria test. Prisms prescribed to neutralize even small amounts of vertical phoria can overcome symptoms and enhance horizontal fusion. Measures of the associated phoria (prism power that reduces fixation disparity to zero) usually indicate that nearly the full amount of any (disassociated) vertical phoria or esophoria needs to be corrected with prism.
Although horizontal prisms are generally less effective than added lenses for high AC/A patients, there are circumstances where prisms are clearly indicated, the most common instance being distance esophorias alleviated by base-out prisms. Often both added lenses and horizontal prisms are necessary; for the high AC/A patient with distance esophoria, base-out prisms can ameliorate the distance problem and a plus add may be needed to handle the greater esophoria at near. In this case, the added plus power prescribed at near will be less if base-out prisms are prescribed to manage the distance esophoria than if no prisms are prescribed. Because of the high AC/A ratio, only a relatively small change in add will result from prescribing a fairly large amount of prism. For a patient with a 10 pd/D AC/A, prescribing 5 pd of base-out prism for a distance esophoria would result in a reduction of the near add by only 0.5 D.
These points about added lenses and prisms notwithstanding, it is necessary to recognize that in the management of high AC/A patients distance esophorias usually require base-out prisms even after receiving vision training. After considering the various optical options for managing these high AC/A patients, their further management like that for all phoria patients and utilize treatment of amblyopia and suppression as well as training fusion and accommodation.
Any amblyopia should be treated with passive occlusion and/or active training, primarily under binocular conditions. Suppression, which is usually slight and confined to the central retina, must also be treated whether or not amblyopia is present. The ultimate goal here is to eliminate any amblyopia and suppression so that sensory and motor fusion training can be maximally effective; however, sensory and motor fusion training can be introduced as the amblyopia and suppression are being eliminated.
For esophoric patients with high AC/A ratios, vision training of fusional vergence is typically only moderately effective for distance and near. However, fusional training can be effective in breaking down suppression and amblyopia. As is the case for all phoria patients, both of the vergence functions (base-in and base-out) and accommodative facility need to be trained. Even though accommodative facility is readily achieved for both esophores and exophores, overall clinical success through training alone is less often achieved for esophores because divergence is less easily improved than is convergence.
Surgery is not often advised for high AC/A phoria patients because of the problem of an ensuing postsurgical diplopia at one distance or the other. It is rarely undertaken because optical and training methods are so successful for these patients. On the rare occasion when they fail, controlled surgery with prompt followup for possible optics and training can be considered.