Nova Southeastern University Office of Academic Affairs Search NSU Site Map Nova Southeastern University
Presidentís Faculty R & D Grant 
Committees, Councils
  and Boards
Faculty Policy Manual
NSU Scholarly Journals
Professional Journals
Prof. Memberships
Academic Policies & Procedures
Provost's Research and Scholarship Award
President's Faculty
 R & D Grant
PFRDG Application Review Process by NSU Librarians
Office of Academic Quality, Assessment, and Accreditation
Contact Us

Print this page  


With a focus on learning, we employ a range of strategies to support innovation, collaboration across centers, and university-wide discussion and decision-making


Twelfth Annual Grant Winners 2011-2012

Title: Comparison of dental treatments to impact the quality of life of children

Robert Uchin, DDS (HPD-DEN)

Faculty and Students:
Peter Murray, PhD (HPD-DEN)
Kenneth N. Namerow, DDS (HPD-DEN)
Melissa Marchesan, DDS (HPD-DEN)
Sergio Kuttler, DDS (HPD-DEN)
Rebecca MacLaughlin, BS (HPD-DEN)
Christine Manguno, BS (HPD-DEN)
Matt Miller, DMD (HPD-DEN)
Juan Francisco Espanol, DMD (HPD-DEN)
Kiran Sreekantaiah, BDS (HPD-DEN)


Human Trafficking Prevention through Faculty Professional DevelopmentThe impact of this clinical research on the treatment of necrotic immature permanent teeth is significant because it will create a clinical evidence base for delivering regenerative endodontic procedures to children. The payback from this research will be to increase root growth, accomplish healing, and maintain teeth to improve the quality of life of children. Studies have shown that 25% of school-aged children will experience some kind of dental trauma and 51% will require treatment for dental decay. However, there have been no clinical trials to compare the regenerative effectiveness of nonsurgical root canal MTA apexification and Gutta percha obturation as a control, versus MTA pulpotomy apexogenesis, versus revascularization in immature permanent teeth with pulpal necrosis. Accordingly, it has not been possible for the AAE to create regenerative guidelines. The goal of this study is to stratify clinical outcomes of regenerative endodontic treatments according to tooth and patient variables. The central hypothesis is that endodontic regeneration procedures are more beneficial to children than traditional obturation or apexification procedures. The objective will be tested by pursuing three specific aims: 1) Test the hypothesis that regenerative endodontic procedures can increase root growth and accomplish healing and function of children's necrotic immature permanent teeth. 2) Test the hypothesis that the outcomes of regenerative endodontic procedures are influenced by the stage of tooth maturation, patient age, patient health status, severity of necrosis and presence of periapical lesions. 3) Test the hypothesis that regenerative endodontic procedures can improve the quality of life of children who have necrotic immature permanent teeth. This clinical research study is innovative because it will recruit up to 130 children and their parents/guardians to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of regenerative endodontic treatments to increase root growth, accomplish healing, and maintain teeth to improve the quality of life of children.