|
Guiding Principles for Chronic Disease Management for Vulnerable and
Disadvantaged People: Pilot Study Findings
|
Karen Grimmer-Somers, PhD1
Michelle Guerin, BAppSc (Hons)2
Julie Luker, MAppSc2
Di Jones, MPA3
Maria Zucco, BAppSc4
-
Director Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South
Australia
-
PhD Student, University of South Australia
-
Manager, Central Northern Adelaide Health Service
-
Physiotherapist, Central Northern Adelaide Health Service
Australia
CITATION:
Grimmer-Somers, K., Guerin, M., Luker, J.. Jones, D., Zucco, M.
Guiding principles for chronic disease management for vulnerable and
disadvantaged people: pilot study findings. The Internet Journal of Allied
Health Sciences and Practice. April 2009, Volume 7 Number 2. 
|
ABSTRACT
Background: The need for chronic disease self-management
(CDS-M) is increasing worldwide. CDS-M programs are variably
effective for vulnerable and disadvantaged individuals. Objectives:
The objects of this study were 1) To explore experiences of health
workers leading CDS-M programs for vulnerable and disadvantaged
populations, and 2) To develop guiding principles for the delivery
of more effective CDS-M programs for vulnerable and disadvantaged
populations. Methods: Two focus groups were undertaken, with all
primary health workers, and allied health (AH) staff in a large
community centre in an Australian city, who worked with vulnerable
and disadvantaged individuals with chronic disease. Results:
Consistent messages were identified, producing nine guiding
principles. Self-management programs / messages should be tailored
to cultural groups, learning styles and available supports, cultural
sensitivities, group leadership requirements, language, literacy
levels, belief systems and social circumstances and supports, past
experiences, and individuals’ ability to motivate change.
Implications: The draft guiding principles may assist others to
deliver more effective CDS-M programs for disadvantaged and
vulnerable populations. |
|
Keywords
and terms: Self-management, chronic disease, vulnerable
clients, disadvantaged populations, Stanford model |
|