|
Impact of a Self-Help Intervention on
Performance of Headache Management Behaviors: A Self-Efficacy
Approach |
|
Dale S. Bond, Ph.D.1
Lynne Durrant, Ph.D.2
Kathleen B. Digre, M.D.3
Susan K.
Baggaley, A.P.R.N. 4
Carla Rubingh, Pharm.D. 5
|
-
VCU Health and
Human Performance Laboratory, Virginia Commonwealth
University, School of Education, Richmond, VA.
-
Department of
Health Promotion and Education, University of Utah, College
of Health, Salt Lake City, UT.
-
Department of
Neurology, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT.
-
Department of
Neurology, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT.
-
University of Utah
Hospitals and Clinics, Pain Management Center, Salt Lake
City, UT.
United
States
|
Citation: Bond, D., Durrant, L., Digre, K., Baggley, S. Rubingh, C: Impact of
self-help intervention on performance of headache management behaviors:
A self-efficacy approach.
The Internet Journal of Allied Health
Sciences and Practice. January 2004. Volume 2 Number 1.
|
Abstract
This study evaluated the importance
of modeling and performance accomplishment of behavior on
enhancing headache management self-efficacy and increasing
acquisition and implementation of four headache self-management
behaviors: headache diary use, limiting medication overuse,
relaxation, and stretching. Primary headache disordered patients
(n = 51) were randomly assigned to 3 conditions:
self-efficacy videotape treatment (SET; education + modeling and
performance of behavior), information-only videotape treatment (IOT;
education only), or no-treatment comparison (NTC). The SET group
reported higher self-efficacy scores than the NTC at immediate
post-treatment. At 1-month follow-up, the SET group reported more
headache diary use than the IOT and NCT groups, whereas both the
SET and IOT groups reported more frequent performance of the
relaxation and stretching behaviors than the NTC group. Despite a
smaller sample size, the SET treatment produced a slight increase
in headache management self-efficacy immediately after treatment,
as well as increased performance of three of the four headache
management behaviors at 1-month follow-up. A reduction in
self-efficacy following the immediate posttreatment period
suggests that multiple treatment exposure may be necessary to
effect long-lasting change with respect to self-efficacy,
behavioral performance and ultimately changes in headache
activity. Although limited in their ability to provide feedback
and reinforcement, the potential benefits for patients and health
care professionals warrant continued development and study of
behavior theory-driven self-help treatment for headache. Future
studies should include a larger sample that consists of motivated
patients with less severe headache problems who may be more apt to
benefit from such theory-driven strategies.
|
|
Keywords
and terms: Headache; Behavior; Self-efficacy; Self-help
treatment
|
|